Entire books have been written about complementarianism and egalitarianism and the claims they both have to being the most “biblical.” I’m not here to get wordy with you. I’m not going to explore the bazillion nuances. I’m not interested in an online discussion. This is my sandbox, and you’re here for some reason. I’m gonna tell you about how I operate in my sandbox, and if you want to stick around and play, feel free. If you don’t like my sandbox story – take your pail and shovel and find your own sandbox.
I’m going to tell you how I see it, as a 25-year survivor of what some would call a complementarian marriage and a current explorer in the new (to me) world of marriage with who some would call an egalitarian man. And when I’m done sharing my personal opinion, you can do whatever the hell you want to with it.
First, I want to get one thing straight. In both complementarian and egalitarian marriages, there is a person with a penis and a person without one. Some call this a gender distinction and want to create all kinds of arguments around it. But isn’t it pretty simple? Think of Dr. Seuss’s Sneetches. Some had stars on their bellies and others had none “upon thars.”
Nobody is saying the genders are a blur of confusion in either of these two supposed marriage options for Christians. God made some female humans and some male humans. These differences are important for procreation and pleasure. Beyond that, they are human beings made in the image of God. Star or no star. This post isn’t going to explore what is reasonably obvious to the average humanoid.
A complementarian marriage, in a nutshell, is when there are clear gender roles based on whether or not you have a star on your belly. If you’ve got a star, you get to be what boss-dependent humans call a boss. If you don’t, you get to be the one who obeys the boss. Because everyone knows a boss can’t be a boss without someone to boss. Get to your places, everyone! This is how the world goes around!
Add to this complementarian narrative specific “boss” type roles for star bellies and specific “unboss type” roles for those without. If you’ve got a star, you can be a doctor or a lawyer or a professor or a pastor or a deacon or whatever you want to be. Your star automatically qualifies you for these “boss” type roles.
If you don’t have a star, you can be a mom, a Sunday School teacher, a nursery worker, a kitchen helper, a midwife, or a pastor’s wife. In complementarian circles, if you let on that you’d like to work full time as a pastor or a CEO of a company, you are reminded that you don’t have a star, and you’re told to submit to the star belly sneetches who are obviously more equipped than you.
Can’t you see that shining star peeking through?
In an egalitarian marriage it doesn’t matter whether you have a star or not. You can be who you are on the inside. Your star or lack thereof doesn’t define you. God defines you. Who you actually are and how you’re actually wired defines you. The stars are just there (or not there) to teach humanoids everywhere that we need one another regardless of gender or race or class or any other human distinction that is blown out of proportion so some humans can be bosses over others.
I think these terms, complementarian and egalitarian, are tired and no longer useful. We don’t need to sound like a bunch of pretentious @&&holes throwing around highfalutin words because we like ourselves when we do. I propose throwing out the smug verbage and adopting simple words that are used in the Bible instead. Is that biblical enough for everyone?
I believe there are Christian marriages and relationships, and there are selfishly controlling marriages and relationships.
I believe two people don’t need to claim faith in Jesus Christ in order to have a Christian marriage. If they are living out their marriage under the Christian principles of relationships, they are living out a Christian marriage, according to the Bible, whether they would call it that or not.
Furthermore, just because two people DO claim faith in Jesus Christ doesn’t necessarily meant they have a Christian marriage. If one or both partners are not living out their marriage under the Christian principles of relationships, their marriage is selfishly controlling.
Of course, no marriage will perfectly live out Christian principles of relationships 100% of the time, but a marriage is either built on that foundation and always growing more deeply in that direction, or it’s not.
So let’s talk about Christian marriage vs. selfishly controlling marriage.
According to the Center for Relationship Abuse Awareness, Relationship abuse is a pattern of abusive and coercive behaviors used to maintain power and control over a former or current intimate partner. Abuse can be emotional, financial, sexual or physical and can include threats, isolation, and intimidation.
Let’s make this super simple. Whether we are talking about social class, gender, race, or any other human distinction, wherever you have a boss maintaining control and power over others, you’ve got relationship control to one degree or another.
“But what about my boss at work? He’s GREAT! Everyone needs to have leaders and authority figures.”
First of all, a work relationship is supposed to be transactional. You want money. They want someone to work for them. You exchange your services for money. In an ideal situation, that’s not a selfishly controlling relationship. It becomes controlling and exploitative when there is manipulation, injustice, violation of boundaries, deception, etc..
Think about it, though. If everyone took personal responsibility and nobody wanted power and control over others, we’d have, well, we’d have heaven on earth. That’s not going to happen, but we’re talking about marriage here, and I believe two people can get pretty damn close to heaven on earth in a Christian marriage relationship.
Marriage is the most intimate human relationship. It is supposed to mirror the intimate relationship between Jesus and His Church. It’s a picture of the beautiful, peaceful co-existence of two humans equally contributing, sharing, and enjoying mutual satisfaction, fulfillment, and pleasure emotionally, physically, and spiritually.
Here’s what you’ve got in a Christian marriage built on the Christian principles of healthy relationships (which, by the way, were all modeled by CHRIST. Hence the term “CHRISTian”:
- Two partners side by side
- Serving one another
- Submission to one another in love (a concept introduced by Paul to new Christians in Ephesians 5.)
And here’s what you’ve got in a selfishly controlling relationship:
- One person in a power-over position
- One person in a power-under position
- Silent treatment
- Foolish arguments
I can hear some of you now. “But I’m in a complementarian marriage where my husband is in a position of power and authority over me, and our relationship looks just like the Christian marriage above.”
Then you don’t know what complementarian really means. You say he is in a power position over you, yet you are side by side? Then what you say you are and what you are actually living out are two different things. Doesn’t that get confusing for you? What would happen if your verbal claims actually lined up with reality? Wouldn’t it be a relief to have logical coherance to those claims? It sure would clear up a lot of foggy confusion for the world about what Christians are really all about.
I know women who claim to be in complementarian marriages who know nothing of a one-sided submission. They have no idea what it is to live in a relationship where their voice means diddly squat unless it lines up with the Grand Poo Bah’s opinion. They aren’t in a true complementarian marriage. Their husbands are actually Christ-like. They are, in reality, equal partners, living like real Christians.
You see, the whole idea of complementarianism is based on the presupposition that men are in power over women. In LOVING power, of course. But power-over is the opposite of love. It’s fleshly and satanic. So I would argue that complementarianism promotes, at its core, a selfish, controlling type of marriage relationship in which one person (the one with the star, obviously) is in charge while the other one submits.
I recently married an egalitarian man. (I’d call him a Christian man.) He has never once treated me like I’m less than because I don’t have a star. He respects and honors my voice 100% of the time, and I respect and honor his. He serves my kids and me, not because he has to jump through hoops to appear to be a Christian on the outside to anyone looking, and not to impress other men, but because it gives him joy. Because THAT’S WHO HE IS with the Holy Spirit alive and well within him. He really IS a Christian on the inside, and that spills over to the outside. It’s a natural, organic thing.
We defer to one another. We stand side by side in a mutual partnership as equals. Our anatomy has nothing to do with our relationship except when we are in bed. And then it comes in handy just the way God meant it to be.
Christ never “powered over” anyone. Real followers of Christ don’t do that either.
This is why we need to burn the trendy terms. “Complementarianism” was made up by some ego-centric Bible teachers who think humans without stars are pawns to be moved on their silly little chess board, and they needed a fancy word that sounded good on the outside to pull the wool over their constituants’ eyes.
Time to throw that game in the fire, where it belongs.
Let’s just be straightforward and say it like it is. Regardless of your beliefs, you are in a Christian-principled marriage or a selfishly controlling marriage.
If you believe you may be in a selfishly controlling marriage, and you’d like help, please sign up HERE to be informed when our next Flying Free support group opens up.
Oh, and P.S. I used the words “hell” and “damn” in this post. But unlike “complementarian” and “egalitarian,” those two words are found in the Bible. Like, lots of times. So, harumph.